Decedents of Cain and the True Chronology of Scripture

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by Joshuastone7, May 28, 2015.

  1. HI Domenic:

    Interesting. Where does it say that Ham had dark skin?

    The Bible says at Genesis 9:24, "When Noah woke up from his wine and learned what his youngest son had done to him," Ham was not the youngest "son" of Noah, Canaan was as the grandson. So, whatever was done to Noah was done by Canaan. Ham recieved not a curse but a rebuke for not stopping his Son. Ham was the eldest son, Seth was middle Son and Japheth was the youngest son of Noah although he had done nothing but good towards his Father.

    Frank
     
  2. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The bible only concerns itself from father to son, and the very nature of "seed" requires father to son, women are irrelevant as to his theory that Cain's descendants survived. Besides Cain's lineage died out before the food.
     
  3. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest


    All the races on earth today come from Noah's family. Yellow, brown, red, white, and black. No I am not saying dark skin people are children of Satan. But, religious leaders used to teach that. It is the reason people could own black slaves, and still feel they were good Christians.
    Religions are not from Jehovah, they are tools of Satan, and the religious leaders are the children of Satan.
    Some on this forum have said, "The Watch Tower has made many mistakes, but they have more truth than all the other religions." Don't fall for that. A ship can be 99% solid steel, but, if the other 1% is a hole, the whole ship is going to sink. Would you book passage on a ship with a 1% hole in it?
    I understand many of you do not like the things I post, but I tell you the truth. If it goes against what you believe, and you are happy with what you believe, pass over any post with my name on it.
     
  4. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest

    WOMEN ARE NOT IRRELEVANT WHEN IT COMES TO CHILDREN...JESUS MOTHER, MARY WAS FROM THE SEED OF ABRAHAM. JESUS HAD TO COME FROM ABRAHAM.

    And no Cain's line did not die out. The name Canaanites means they are from Cain. Take a bit of this one. The Name Mc Cain: The Mc means, FROM.

    So the name McCain means: From CAIN.
     
  5. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest


    HAM
    Father of the Black Races
    More legends have arisen and more lies have been told about Hăm than about any other character in Scripture. Sadly, more lore than truth is known about Hăm, his name, and the land he founded. Hăm was the father of the black races, and he undoubtedly carried the most dominant genes regarding skin pigmentation, since he named his firstborn son Cush, which means black. Hăm must have been a very great man, since centuries after his death the book of Psalms referred to ancient Egypt as “the land of Hăm.†(Ps. 105:23, 27) “Webster’s Dictionary†states that Hăm was the progenitor of the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Nubians, Canaanites, and Libyans. In the Middle East, Hăm’s name is imbedded in the names of the world’s most honored statesmen and religious figures which the book Blacks in the Bible Vol. I details. Although Hăm was the father of the black races his name does not mean black. It was Cush, his son, whose name meant black. However, the Scriptures indicate that Ham’s name means village/multitude (nation). It is interesting to note that in America Ham’s name means something entirely different than it meant in Mother England. The common usage of the word Ham in the West refers to the flesh of one of the filthiest creatures on earth, the pig. However, in Great Britain, a land far older than America, the word “ham†does not have its roots in swine’s flesh, but rather means a village.
     
  6. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do you think naming a child something proves genetics?

    And you are mistaken, again, the Bible only concerns itself with father to son. No matter what you say or think you will never be able to overcome that one.
     
  7. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And now your naming the color of skin, okay, after claiming he's the seed of Satan... Pheww

    Now back to what you haven't answered, did Ham have the same father and mother as his brothers?
     
  8. Hi Joshua:

    I can't believe that you can say that women have nothing to do with the seed with a straight face. You can't be serious and if you are it I am quite surprised. But I have no interest in arguing the point with you because I know that once you set your mind on something, even if wrong you will not give in. Like I said before both the women and the man contribute 1/2 of the seed of the child, you cannot discount the contribution of the woman. Many traits we receive as recessive traits from our maternal grandfathers, like male pattern baldness.

    Frank
     
  9. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It doesn't matter what we think, I know that women pass on 50% of genetics, your still not getting it.

    The Bible concerns itself with father to son, which number one means you will never and I mean never be able to say that a female from the line of Cain was on the ark, because those records do not exist. Period period period period.

    Number two, if your saying the line could be through women then that invalidates this whole argument about Gen 3:15 in the first place. Listen............... Domenic said that the women was Eve, right????? And that "your" seed was from Satan, Right?????? Therefore you cannot have Eves descendants as part of that line, and she's a women..... She would have mothered both of them making them both her seed if it's metaphorical like your saying it would be with Hams wife!!! You can't have it mean male at Gen 3:15 and then change it down the line. You claim the line of Adam is father to mother don't you???? What if a son of Shem had a child with one of Hams descendants???

    So again, even if she had Satan's child it would have been through her and would have been of her seed, which right there invalidates the whole thing because she would have been the mother of both Adams and Satan's seed. That means Gen 3:15 would be lying if it separated the two...

    Stay with me now, I know you can. Genetics lose their potency over time, so there would have had to have a true blood Cain descendant all the way to Hams wife in order to make any child she mothered 50% Cains offspring.... But guess what, the Bible's discussion of Cain's line dies off hundreds of years before the flood. How much of Cain did she have? 100%, 50% because a parent wasn't of that line? 25%, 12.5%, etc etc etc etc.... And as time goes on and 4000 years pass, what about the .000000000000000000000001% genetic connection to a theoretic female from the line of Cain that you can't prove anyway????? Do you see how simple minded this is to continue?

    This whole notion is so ridiculous and so hypocritical I don't even know why I continue the subject. It's all in hopes that in some way we can understand that this is why the Third Reich killed millions...
     
  10. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Look, I'm going to put this subject in its place. Let's look at Gen 3:15, one more time.

    Gen 3:15 "And I will put enmity between you and the woman and between your offspring and her offspring. He will crush your head, and you will strike him in the heel.â€￾

    Who is bruised in the heel? The women's seed, right? Is that every single person born of her line? (Which would include anyone coming out of her womb!) No, it refers to Jesus........ So who is the women's seed in that scripture??? Jesus... Period.

    Now is this women Eve???? No, no she's not, because look;

    Gen 12:1,2 "Then a great sign was seen in heaven: A woman was arrayed with the sun, and the moon was beneath her feet, and on her head was a crown of 12 stars, and she was pregnant. And she was crying out in her pains and in her agony to give birth."

    There we go, the women is pregnant with her seed, and guess who she gives birth to; :D

    Rev 12:5,6 "And she gave birth to a son, a male, who is to shepherd all the nations with an iron rod. And her child was snatched away to God and to his throne."

    So therefore the seed of the women is a single male child! Slum dunk!

    And who is that seed of the women? Jesus who shepherds with an iron rod and goes to Gods throne after his death.

    Therefore......... The women is metaphoric in Gen 3:15 because it clearly leads you to Rev 12 and the birth of Christ which means the women is the organizational arrangement from God.

    So if the seed of the women is Christ, and the women is Gods organizational arrangement, and Satan is the one spoken to, then who is Satan's seed???????

    Metaphoric, all those who oppose Christ Jesus!
     
  11. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest

    Okay Josh, lets play it your way: The seed has to come from the father. Jesus had no human father. To be the Messiah his seed had to come from Abraham. If Jesus was not from the line of Abrahams seed, he could not have been the Messiah. So now, please unscrew that one for me?
     
  12. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I have to give it you, nice try...

    But just a little short...

    Now, obviously Jesus had to come from heaven and couldn't come out of Joseph, so only a women was able to have Jesus. It just so happens Mary's lineage was known, but that fact alone would have invalidated his right to the line of kingship because from whom were the Jews looking for the Christ??? From father to son from David...

    Now the final nail is the fact that Joseph adopted Jesus giving him all the birth rights of Josephs lineage, and that alone is what gave Jesus his right to the lineage of David, the throne... :D

    Regardless, the women in Gen 3:15 is the same as Rev 12, I posted that fact in #30.
     
  13. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest


    That does not cover it. Frank was spot on...50% is from the mother. If it did not matter, Jesus could have come from anybody if all it had to be was Jesus to be adopted. You are wrong, and again like frank said..."Even when you are wrong, you just won't stand up to it.
    I think you would even tell Jehovah he is wrong if it did not fit into you thinking. No insult intended.
     
  14. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Reply to #29 and #30 please. I already addressed this in those posts.
     
  15. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest

    You don't understand Genesis 3:15 for some reason? Eve is not from Satan. If is not the Heavenly government as the Watch Tower teaches.

    Reade genesis 3:15 in the scrolls...the word they used in the bible, SEED, is not what genesis 3:15 says...the word is SPERMA. it is were we get the word SPERM. The heavenly Government would not have SPERM. That word SPERMA also means OFF SPRING. God is talking to Satan about his OFF Spring made from SPERM with the women EVE...Thus we have Cain.
    My friend, if you do not understand Genesis 3:15, you will have the rest of the bible wrong...again, no insult intended, but you are way off base. You are following a Watch Tower teaching with genesis 3:15.
     
  16. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Please respond to post #30, the women in Gen 3:15 is clearly the same women in Rev 12.
     
  17. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest


    Look again: Gen 3:15 "And I will put enmity between you and the woman and between your offspring and her offspring. He will crush your head, and you will strike him in the heel.â€￾

    Remember, when the scrolls were written, they had no punctuations. Sentences ran together, no periods, nothing. There are two sentences here:

    A) And I will put enmity between you and the woman and between your offspring and her offspring.

    B) He will crush your head, and you will strike him in the heel.â€￾


    Genesis 12:1,2 is not a real women. This is the birth of the heavenly Organization

    C) Gen 12:1,2 "Then a great sign was seen in heaven: A woman was arrayed with the sun, and the moon was beneath her feet, and on her head was a crown of 12 stars, and she was pregnant. And she was crying out in her pains and in her agony to give birth."

    In A) God is telling Satan he will put hate between Satan's off springs, and those from Adam.
    In B) God is telling Satan Jesus will kill him for all time, and Satan would only kill Jesus for a short time.
    In C) Is the birth of the heavenly organization

    You are trying to put three things together to make them one event. A) is an earthly physical event. B), and C) are spiritual events.
     
  18. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The women would have been the mother of both offspring. If you are saying the line came through women to the ark, and you are saying Satan fathered children through her, the women's offspring would have been both sides. That would make the statement, "And I will put enmity between you and the woman and between your offspring and her offspring." invalid, because both sides would have been her offspring. That is so simple why are you overlooking it???

    Number two, you have no records of any of Cains offspring, male of female surviving the flood, therefore the whole idea must be scraped. Simply put you have no record of it, that makes it a personal interpretation. Period...

    The seed in Gen 3:15 is the "he", Jesus. The scripture clearly says that the seed is the "he" that is bruised in the heel, not a line of individuals. HER SEED=HE=JESUS

    For theoretical sake, had Hams wife been 100% genetically from Cain, her child would have only been 50%, where as Shem's children would have been 100% on down the line genetic children of Adam, and as time went on the Cain line would have continued to have been polluted.

    Three, the women in Gen 3 is the same women as Rev 12. The "he" is the same child that is born in Rev 12, Jesus in both verses. Satan in Rev 12 is the same Satan as spoken to in Gen 3.... It is the same women, it is the same Jesus, it is the same Satan, no if and's or buts about it unless you want impose your own understanding.

    The prophecy of Gen 3 is not racist, the entire Bible holds the fact that we must choose to follow Christ, without any concern for our Genes after Cornelius was baptized, and in many individual cases prior. Peter saw a sheet coming down with unclean animals, and Jehovah told him to stop calling unclean what he said is clean, which meant all of mankind, you should reread that incident. (Acts 10)
     
  19. 0
    0
    0
    Domenic

    Domenic Guest

    As a young Christian I learned a very true lesion. Those in the world are like a man standing in the center of a deep muddy pond. He is asking for help. “Please sir ,â€￾ he says,â€￾ I am dirty from the top of my head, to the bottom of my feet. Will you please come, and help me get clean?â€￾
    I cannot go into the pond to clean him. If I do I also will become dirty from the top of my head, to the bottom of my feet. “Come out,â€￾ I say. He begs me to come to him. I cannot. I wait.

    Jehovah God will not enter into the mud. Those seeking his help must first come out. ifnthey do not, they will sink as all those before them.
     
  20. 4,650
    838
    113
    Joshuastone7

    Joshuastone7 Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do you know what a paradox is? Your theory is so full of them, but yet you hold on to the theory.

    And the simplest of them all, Eve would have been mother to both seeds, making her seed every line ever born, but yet you say Satan's sperma isn't Eves seed? She would have had the child! You say Adams seed is the women's seed, why? Because she had the child. She would have had them both!

    Do you know how this makes you look among your peers, those who actually know the Bible? You put your head down and march forward while your peers look at you and wonder why you have such blinders on and blaze along in such nonsense.

    You have no evidence that Cains offspring made it on the ark, yet you continue to sing that song. Gen 3 and Rev 12 are the same women, same Jesus, same Satan, yet you refuse to see fact when it's glaring in your face.

    There's a scripture that reminds me of you;

    2Tim 3:7 "always learning and yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge of truth."
     

Share This Page